PEMILU BERINTEGRITAS SEBAGAI PILAR PENGUATAN PERADABAN DEMOKRASI: REFLEKSI DAN TANTANGAN DALAM KONTEKS INDONESIA
Kata Kunci:
digital disinformationAbstrak
Integritas pemilu merupakan pilar fundamental bagi penguatan demokrasi, khususnya dalam konteks Indonesia yang menghadapi kompleksitas politik elektoral. Studi ini menganalisis refleksi dan tantangan yang muncul dalam pemilu di Indonesia melalui tiga dimensi utama: politik uang dan transparan- si dana kampanye, disinformasi digital dan polarisasi politik, serta kapasitas kelembagaan penyelenggara dan penegak hukum pemilu. Studi ini meng- gunakan metode kualitatif dengan analisis dokumen dengan menjadikan laporan lembaga pemantau, berita daring, dan literatur akademik sebagai unit analisis melalui analisis isi tematik. Hasil studi ini menunjukkan praktik politik uang masih sering terjadi, pelaporan dana kampanye belum transpar- an, dan disinformasi digital memperkuat polarisasi politik. Selain itu, kap- asitas institusi penyelenggara dan penegak hukum terbatas akibat sumber daya, regulasi kompleks, dan intervensi politik. Studi ini merekomendasikan perlunya strategi komprehensif mencakup transparansi pendanaan poli- tik, literasi digital, regulasi platform, serta penguatan kapasitas dan inde- pendensi lembaga pemilu untuk demokrasi yang sehat dan berkelanjutan.
Referensi
Ahmed, S. K., Moham- med, R. A., Nashwan, A. J., Ibra-
him, R. H., Abdalla, A. Q., M.
Ameen, B. M., & Khdhir, R. M. (2025). Using thematic analy- sis in qualitative research. Jour- nal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 6(April), 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glme- di.2025.100198
Arora, S. D., Singh, G. P., Chakraborty, A., & Maity, M. (2022). Polarization and social media: A systematic review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech- fore.2022.121942
Aspinall, E., Rohman, N., Hamdi, A. Z., Rubaidi, & Trianti- ni, Z. E. (2017). Vote buying in In- donesia: Candidate strategies, mar- ket logic and effectiveness. Journal of East Asian Studies. https://doi. org/10.1017/jea.2016.31
Berenschot, W. (2018). The Political Economy of Clien- telism: A Comparative Study of Indonesia’s Patronage Democra- cy. Comparative Political Studies, 51(12), 1563–1593. https://doi. org/10.1177/0010414018758756
Birnir, J. K., Okthariza, N., Agustyati, K. N., & Pratama, H. M. (2025). The Patriarchy in the Par- ties: Voters, parties and women’s electoral fortunes in the 2024 leg- islative election in Indonesia. Elec- toral Studies, 95(May), 102938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elect- stud.2025.102938
Boler, M., Gharib, H., Kweon, Y. J., Trigiani, A., & Per- ry, B. (2025). Promoting Mis/ Disinformation Literacy Among
Adults: A Scoping Review of Interventions and Recommen- dations. Communication Re- search, 1–33. https://doi. org/10.1177/00936502251318630
Caluwaerts, D., Bernaerts, K., Kesberg, R., Smets, L., & Spruyt, B. (2023). Deliberation and polarization: a multi-disciplinary review. In Frontiers in Political Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpos.2023.1127372
Cox, C. (2022). Dark
Money in Congressional House Elections. SSRN Electronic Jour- nal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.4047686
Garnett, H. A., & James,
T. S. (2023). Electoral backslid- ing? Democratic divergence and trajectories in the quality of elec- tions worldwide. Electoral Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elect- stud.2023.102696
González, R., Mackenna, B., Scherman, A., & Joignant, A. (2024). Fairness beyond the ballot: A comparative analysis of failures of electoral integrity, perceptions of electoral fairness, and atti- tudes towards democracy across
countries. Electoral Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elect- stud.2023.102740
Guerrero-Sierra, Hugo,
Duque, Pedro, & Niño, César. (2024). Analysis of worldwide research on clientelism: Or- igins, evolution, and trends. Social Science Information, 63(3), 319–353. https://doio- rg/10.1177/05390184241268381
Higashijima, M., Kadoya, H., & Yanai, Y. (2024). The Dy- namics of Electoral Manipulation and Institutional Trust in Democ- racies: Election Timing, Blatant
Fraud, and the Legitima- cy of Governance. Public Opin- ion Quarterly, 88(SI), 472–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/ nfae022
Klasén, L., Fock, N., & Forchheimer, R. (2024). The invisible evidence: Digital fo- rensics as key to solving crimes in the digital age. Forensic Sci- ence International, 362(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsci- int.2024.112133
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker,
U. K. H., Cook, J., van der Linden, S., Roozenbeek, J., & Oreskes, N. (2023). Misinformation and the epistemic integrity of democracy. In Current Opinion in Psycholo- gy.
Lindberg, S. I., Lo Bue,
M. C., & Sen, K. (2022). Clien-
telism, corruption and the rule
of law. World Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.world- dev.2022.105989
Lundmark, S., Oscarsson, H., & Weissenbilder, M. (2020). Confidence in an election au- thority and satisfaction with de- mocracy: Evidence from a qua- si-natural experiment of a failed election in Sweden. Electoral Stud- ies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. electstud.2020.102216
Mace, S. (2025). Fragil- ity of democratic minimalism: why the ballot is insufficient for democracy. Frontiers in Politi- cal Science, 7(2020). https://doi. org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1493830
Madriaza, P., Hassan, G., Brouillette-Alarie, S., Mounchin- gam, A. N., Durocher-Corfa, L., Borokhovski, E., Pickup, D., & Paillé, S. (2025). Exposure to hate in online and traditional media: A systematic review and meta-analy- sis of the impact of this exposure on individuals and communities. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 21(1).
Marino, M., Iacono, R., & Mollerstrom, J. (2024). (Mis-) Perceptions, information, and political polarization: A survey and a systematic literature re- view. European Journal of Po-
litical Economy, 85, 102578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpole- co.2024.102578
Mietzner, M. (2010). Polit- ical conflict resolution and demo- cratic consolidation in Indonesia: The role of the constitutional court. Journal of East Asian Stud- ies. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1598240800003672
Mont’Alverne, C., Ar- guedas, A. R., Banerjee, S., Toff, B., Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2024). The Electoral Misinfor- mation Nexus: How News Con- sumption, Platform Use, and Trust in News Influence Belief in Electoral Misinformation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 88(SI), 681– 707. https://doi.org/10.1093/ poq/nfae019
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D.
G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Suscep- tibility to partisan fake news is bet- ter explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cog- nition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cognition.2018.06.011
Sanna, G. A., & Lagna- do, D. (2025). Belief updating in the face of misinformation: The role of source reliability. Cog- nition, 258(February), 106090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogni- tion.2025.106090
Schnaudt, C. (2024). Per- ceptions of Electoral Integrity and Election-Related (Non-)Compli- ance: Evidence from Germany. Political Studies. https://doio- rg/10.1177/00323217241290584
Sharma, A. D. (2025). Political Finance and Patronage Behind Disinformation: Evidence From India’s Election Campaigns. Inter- national Journal of Communica- tion, 19, 2342–2360.
Tobin, C., Aronson, B., Ma- jumder, S., Tanenbaum, H., Weber, E., Carey, J. M., Fogarty, B., Ny- han, B., & Reifler, J. (2025). Losing predicts perceptions that elections were decided by fraud, but margin of loss and candidate race do not. Electoral Studies, 93(November 2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. electstud.2024.102880
Triwardani, R. (2021). In- donesian officials and media fight vaccine hesitancy, misinformation. Asian Politics & Policy. https:// doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12608
Vasist, P. N., Chatterjee, D., & Krishnan, S. (2024). The Polarizing Impact of Political Dis- information and Hate Speech: A Cross-country Configural Narra- tive. Information Systems Fron- tiers.
