CHARACTERISTICS OF LEGAL AND ETHICAL REASONING IN DKPP DECISIONS: ANALYSIS OF CASES OF IMMORTAL ACTS
Keywords:
Legal Reasoning, Ethical Reasoning, DKPP Decision, Immoral ConductAbstract
This research analyzes DKPP decisions using legal and ethical reasoning approaches as the fundamental foundation. The research problems are: first, what are the characteristics of legal and ethical reasoning in DKPP decisions? Second, what are the implications of DKPP decisions related to immoral conduct? This research is normative research using statutory, con- ceptual, and case approaches. The results of this research are: first, DKPP decisions have different characteristics and reasoning models in each deci- sion. DKPP Decision Number: 327-PKE-DKPP/XII/2019 employs Le- gal Positivism and Ethical Positivism reasoning models; DKPP Decision Number: 42-PKE-DKPP/IV/2020 uses Legal Realism and Ethical Real- ism reasoning models; DKPP Decision Number 16-PKE-DKPP/I/2021 utilizes Historical School reasoning model and also applies analogical rea- soning method; and DKPP Decision Number 145-PKE-DKPP/VII/2024 employs Legal and Ethical Utilitarianism reasoning model. Second, the im- plications of DKPP decisions related to immoral conduct can take the form of Landmark Decisions and ethical jurisprudence.
References
Andrew Lister, ‘Reflective Equilibrium: Epistemological Or Political’, Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 26, no. 2 (2008).
Florian Ladurner, ‘An Eth- ics of Sanctions? Attempt and Cri- tique of the Moral Justification of
Economic Sanctions’, F. Ladurner 8, no. 2 (2023): 313–43.
Matthew Silverstein, ‘Eth- ics and Practical Reasoning’, Eth- ics 127 (January 2017).
Oliver Weldell Holmes, The Common Law (Boston; Little Brown, 1963).
Ratna Dewi Pettalolo, Pe- nalaran Etika: Konsep Dan Pener- apan, 1st ed. (Kompas, 2024).
Shidarta, Hukum Penalar- an Dan Penalaran Hukum (Genta Publishing, 2013).
Shidarta, “Penalaran Hu- kum dalam Sudut Pandang Kelu- arga Sistem Hukum dan Penstudi Hukum,” Jurnal Era Hukum, Ta- hun 11, No. 1 (September 2003),
Shidarta Shidarta., Makna Integritas Penegak Hukum Dan Hakim Dalam Pandangan Filsafat. (Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudi- sial Republik Indonesia, 2023).
Soekanto Soerjono and Mamudji Sri, ‘Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat’, in Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2011.
Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, 2024.
Supriyadi Supriyadi and Andi Intan Purnamasari, ‘Rede- sign of Administrative Violation Handling at Bawaslu Post Deter- mination of Election Results’, Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 1 (25
March 2023): 159–78, https://doi. org/10.31078/jk2019.
Supriyadi Supriyadi, Andi Intan Purnamasari, Analisis Putu- san DKPP Terkait Dengan Per- buatan Asusila Dari Perspektif Pe- nalaran Etika dalam buku Refleksi dan Evaluasi Penegakan Hukum Pemilu 2024 (Dari Bawaslu Kali- mantan Selatan untuk Indonesia), RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2025.
Suparman Marzuki, Pu- tusan Hakim sebagai “Mahkota” didalam buku Memotret Per- timbangan Putusan Hakim dari Berbagai Perspektif, Sekretariat
